What the canon Zootopia Origins & Annexation story is NOT intended to promote: ideologies, ideas, concepts, & beliefs

While I do explain a few of the things that the Story is intended to promote on https://saynotodemocidetrivia.blogspot.com/2017/03/announcement-explanation-of-zootopia.html, I know that there may be a few people who may misunderstand what I'm trying to promote here. So here's a few things which the Story is NOT intended to promote, endorse, and/or otherwise have positivity about.

. Hate against people (such as racism, hatred of people for their religion, etc).
While I am very critical of religion and, yes, make fun of religion and certain aspects of some cultures (rather it be socio-political paradigms, child marriage, involuntary body modification , etc), I will NOT advocate hate against people.

I disagree with Ry's belifs about law enforcement (though I do belive in reform, especially when it comes to training).

. Law enforcement militarization.

While I do not object to having SWAT teams to deal with dangerous situations and/or violence that regular peace officers couldn't adequately handle on their own (without significant harm to innocents), such as hostage situations for example, I do not want an overly-militarized mindset in law enforcement, private security-patrol, and/or bounty hunting. I do certainly want people who are in law enforcement, private security-patrol, and bounty hunting to be trained and equipped to deescalate violence and use violence as a last resort measure.

. Hating people in military and/or law enforcement.

I see armed forces as neither inherently good nor purely evil, but more as tools; they are good or evil depending on their use.

. Foreign interventionism.

While I do admit to having Cascadia buying islands, creating a propaganda campaign to get separatist movements in western Europe to rise, along with the interventions in Korea and Vietnam.

However, these are exceptions rather than rules, and the world is a different place today than from back in the cold war.

For the video below, skip to 21:11.

. Advocating anarchism.

If you identify as anarcho-communist or anarcho-socialist, please ask yourself rather you're being serious or you think that the word "anarcho" sounds cool or radical or whatnot without serious regard to philosophy..

. Collectivism, collective punishment, or aggression.

I belive that people shouldn't be punished for things that they have little to nothing to do with, and that individuals hold the right to life, liberty, and property.

While I may not purely follow the non-agression principle, I still very strongly follow and promote it.

When is violence justified? | StormCloudsGathering

Six Reasons Libertarians Should Reject the Non-Aggression Principle

I also reccomend reading Toward a Theory of Peace.

This includes initiating violence against government (do NOT do that: only bad things will happen.)